The following publications based on the LISS Panel Data Archive data are currently available.
Please note that the publications related to a specific study can be found on the Study Views.
For this, go to
Browse Studies
and choose the required study and measure.
Loont het om huishoudens zonder internet op te nemen in een internetpanel?; Jaarboek MarktOnderzoekAssociatie, Hoofdstuk 5, 75-88
; Leenheer, J.
et al. Luiaards en trouwe deelnemers: Classificatie van respondenten in een panelstudie ; Jaarboek MarktOnderzoekAssociatie, Hoofdstuk 8, 123-137
; Lugtig, P. ‘Bought it, but Never Got it’ Assessing Risk Factors for Online Consumer Fraud Victimization; European Sociological Review, online first; Van Wilsem, Johan Ambiguity attitudes and portfolio choice: Evidence from a large representative survey; Netspar Discussion Papers, DP 06/2011-054; Dimmock, S. G.
et al. Bouwstenen voor een wettelijke regeling van 'zware beroepen' ; Nederlands Recht, Tilburg University; Wentink, S.A.A.M. Can verbal instructions counteract visual context effects in web surveys? ; Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 75(1), 1-18.; Toepoel, Vera
et al. Cultural participation of older adults: Investigating the contribution of lowbrow and highbrow activities to social integration and satisfaction with life; International Journal of Disability and Human Development; Toepoel, Vera Data Collection in a Probability Based Internet Panel: How the LISS panel was Built and How It Can Be Used; Bulletin of Sociological Methodology, Vol. 109(1), 56-61 ; Scherpenzeel, Annette Doe-het-zelf rechtspraak: Steun voor eigenrichting; Rechtstreeks, No 2; Haas, N. Does it matter how happiness is measured? Evidence from a randomized controlled experiment; University of Zurich, Working Paper No. 49; Studer, R. Does social desirability compromise self-reports of physical activity in web-based research? ; International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, Vol. 8(31); Crutzen, R.
et al. Evaluating the Psychometric Properties of the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF) ; Journal of Clinical Psychology, Vol. 67, p.99-110; Lamers, Sanne M.A.
et al. Flexwerk en werkzekerheid in tijden van crisis (Flexjobs and employment security in times of crisis); Economisch Statistische Berichten; Muffels, Ruud
et al. Household survey panels: how much do following rules affect sample size?; Survey Research Methods, Vol. 5(2), 253-261; Schonlau, Matthias
et al. Impact of age norms and stereotypes on managers' hiring decisions of retirees ; Netspar Discussion Papers, DP 05/2011-049; Karpinska, K.
et al. Kenmerken en motieven van het PVV electoraat; Universiteit van Utrecht, Master Multiculturalisme in Vergelijkend Perspectief; Van Dongen, B. Legitimiteitsmonitor democratisch bestuur; Hendriks, F.
et al. Measuring risk perceptions: What does the excessive use of 50% mean?; Medical Decision Making, online first; Bruine de Bruin, W.
et al. Mode Effect or Question Wording? Measurement Error in Mixed Mode Surveys; JSM Proceedings, Survey Research Methods Section. 5959-5967.; De Leeuw, Edith
et al. Panel attrition: Separating stayers, sleepers and lurkers; Utrecht University, Department of Methods and Statistics; Lugtig, P. Perceived intergroup difference as an organizing principle of intercultural attitudes and acculturation attitudes. ; Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, online first; Van Osch, Y.M.J.
et al. Response style behavior: Question format dependent or personal style?; Quantity and Quality, online first; Kieruj, Natalia D.
et al. Slapers en inactieven binnen online panels; Ontwikkelingen in het marktonderzoek: Jaarboek MarktOnderzoekAssociatie, dl. 36, 2011, 189-204; Scherpenzeel, Annette
et al. Temporary employment and firm-sponsored training.; Picchio, M.
et al. The impact of “forgiving” introductions on the reporting of sensitive behavior in surveys. The role of social desirability response style and developmental status. ; Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 75(4), 779-787; Peter, J.
et al. The opinion of adolescents and adults on Dutch restrictive and educational alcohol policy measures; Health Policy, Vol. 99(1), 10-16; Van der Sar, R.
et al. The opinion on Dutch cannabis policy measures; Drugs: Education, prevention and policy, Vol. 18(3), 161-171; Van der Sar, R.
et al. Who Takes Advantage of Free Flu Shots? Examining the Effects of an Expansion in Coverage; TILEC Discussion Paper No. 2011-011. ; Carman, Katherine Grace
et al. Words, Numbers, and Visual Heuristics in Web Surveys: Is There a Hierarchy of Importance? ; Social Science Computer Review, Vol. 29(2), 193-207; Toepoel, Vera
et al. Worlds tied together? Online and non-domestic routine activities and their impact on digital and traditional threat victimization; European Journal of Criminology, Vol. 8(2), 115–127; Wilsem, Johan van A comparison of the quality of ESS questions in different data collection modes; working paper; Revilla, Melanie
et al. Attention and Usability in Internet Surveys: Effects of Visual Feedback in Grid Questions.; In: M. Das, P. Ester, & L. Kaczmirek (Eds.), Social and Behavioral Research and the Internet: Advances in Applied Methods and Research Strategies; Kaczmirek, L. C3B: Exploiting the Numerous Possibilities Web Technology Offers to Elevate Questions; Working paper; Wijnant, Arnaud
et al. Can Biomarkers be Collected in an Internet Survey? A Pilot Study in the LISS Panel; In: M. Das, P. Ester, & L. Kaczmirek (Eds.), Social and Behavioral Research and the Internet: Advances in Applied Methods and Research Strategies; Avendano, Mauricio
et al. Challenges in Reaching Hard-to-Reach Groups in Internet Panel Research.; In: M. Das, P. Ester, & L. Kaczmirek (Eds.), Social and Behavioral Research and the Internet: Advances in Applied Methods and Research Strategies; Vis, C.M.
et al. Cultural Participation and Social Capital; Msc Thesis; Mulders, M.G. Digitale en traditionele bedreiging vergeleken; Tijdschrift voor Criminologie, Vol. 52(1), 73-87; Wilsem, Johan van Ethical Considerations in Internet Surveys; In: M. Das, P. Ester, & L. Kaczmirek (Eds.), Social and Behavioral Research and the Internet: Advances in Applied Methods and Research Strategies; Singer, E.
et al. Flu Shots, Mammogram, and the Perception of Probabilities; Netspar Discussion Paper No. 03/2010-014 ; Carman, K.G.
et al. Gekocht maar niet gekregen: Slachtofferschap van online oplichting nader onderzocht; Tijdschrift voor Veiligheid, Vol. 9(4), 16-29; Wilsem, Johan van Handedness predicts social preferences evidence connecting the lab to the field; Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper, TI 2010-119/3; Buser, T. How representative are online panels? ; In: M. Das, P. Ester, & L. Kaczmirek (Eds.), Social and Behavioral Research and the Internet: Advances in Applied Methods and Research Strategies; Scherpenzeel, Annette
et al. How to Cover the General Population by Internet Interviewing: Problems of Coverage and Selection and Possible Solutions. ; Alert! magazine, March 2010, Volume 50 No. 3; Scherpenzeel, Annette Married with Children: A Collective Labor Supply Model with Detailed Time Use and Intrahousehold Expenditure Information; Tilburg University CentER Discussion Paper No. 2010-99. ; Cherchye, Laurens
et al. Measuring Attitudes Toward controversial Issues in Internet Surveys: Order effects of Open and Closed Questioning.; In: M. Das, P. Ester & L. Kaczmirek (Eds.). Social and Behavioral Research and the Internet: Advances in Applied Methods and Research Strategies; Ester, P.
et al. Mental illness and mental health: The two continua model across the lifespan; Journal of Adult Development, Vol. 17(2), 110-119; Westerhof, Gerben J.
et al. Opgroeien aan de onderkant van de samenleving ; Universiteit Utrecht, Departement Bestuurskunde & Organisatiewetenschap; Akdag, E. Political preference and subjective well-being.; Maastricht University, School of Business and Economics; Slangen, T.J.H. Public Support for Vigilantism; PhD Thesis; Haas, Nicole Social and Behavioral Research and the Internet; European Association of Methodology; Das, Marcel
et al. Social desirability and self-reported health risk behaviors in web based research: Three longitudinal studies ; BMC Public Health, Vol. 10 (720) ; Crutzen, R.
et al. Studying the relationship between social internet activities and social capital; Leisure Studies, Tilburg University; Haberland, S. The Influence of Economic and Cultural Capital on Drinking Behavior; Working paper; Wagemakers, Sandra
et al. Toward controversial Issues in Internet Surveys: Order effects of Open and Closed Questioning.; In: M. Das, P. Ester, & L. Kaczmirek (Eds.), Social and Behavioral Research and the Internet: Advances in Applied Methods and Research Strategies; Ester, Peter
et al. True Longitudinal and Probability-Based Internet Panels: Evidence from the Netherlands; In: M. Das, P. Ester, & L. Kaczmirek (Eds.), Social and Behavioral Research and the Internet: Advances in Applied Methods and Research Strategies; Scherpenzeel, Annette
et al. Using Interactive Features to Motivate and Probe Responses to Open-Ended Questions; In: M. Das, P. Ester, & L. Kaczmirek (Eds.), Social and Behavioral Research and the Internet: Advances in Applied Methods and Research Strategies.; Oudejans, Marije
et al. Variations in response style behavior by response scale format in attitude research; International Journal of Public Opinion Research, Vol. 22(3), 320-342; Natalia Kieruj, Guy Moors Wavering respondent loyalties: a comparison of three models of political attitude change; Msc Thesis; Grootel, Leonie What Does Behavioral Economics Mean for Policy? Challenges to Savings and Health Policies in the Netherlands; De Economist, Vol. 158(2),101–122.; Kooreman, Peter
et al. Innovations and new technologies in panel research. ; FORS Working Paper Series; Scherpenzeel, Annette Perceptions of nutrigenomics.; PhD Thesis; Pin, R.R. Political Trust; a Matter of Personality Factors or Satisfaction with Government Performance?; PhD Thesis; Voortman, H. Relating Question Type to Panel Conditioning: A Comparison between Trained and Fresh Respondents; Survey Research Methods; Toepoel, Vera
et al. Representativeness in online panels: How far can we reach; Working paper; Knoef, Marike
et al. Traditionele jongeren en onafhankelijke ouderen; Demos, bulletin over bevolking en samenleving, jaargang 25, nr. 2, 1-4.; Kalmijn, Matthijs
et al. A Closer Look at Web Questionnaire Design; PhD Thesis; Toepoel, Vera An online panel as a platform for multi-disciplinary research; In: I. Stoop & M. Wittenberg (Eds.). Access panels en online onderzoek, panacee of slangenkuil? ; Scherpenzeel, Annette Design Effects in Web Surveys: Comparing Trained and Fresh Respondents; Public Opinion Quarterly, vol. 72 (2008), nr. 5, p. 985-1007; Toepoel, Vera
et al. Exploring the effect of a middle response category on response style in attitude measurement ; Quality & Quantity, Vol. 42(6), pages 779–794; Moors, Guy Geestelijke gezondheid is meer dan de afwezigheid van geestelijke ziekte ; Maandblad Geestelijke Volksgezondheid; Westerhof, Gerben J.
et al. The dutch no to the EU constitution: Assessing the role of EU skepticism and the campaign; Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties, Vol. 18(1), 101-128; Schuck, Andreas R. T.
et al. Do Questions about Watching Internet Pornography Make People Watch Internet Pornography? A Comparison Between Adolescents and Adults. ; International Journal of Public Opinion Research, online first; Peter, J.
et al. Emulating Interviewers in an Online Survey: Experimental Manipulation of ‘Do-Not-Know’ over the Phone and on the Web; JSM Proceedings, Survey Research Methods Section. 6305-6314.; De Leeuw, Edith
et al. 